Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Major Brand - Almost Totally Black & White Website | Main | Questions for Matt Dent »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Agree with almost all of that, Ben. Almost, because from what I can see, the shots look rather too good. Wouldn't it be better if they looked more like 'real' cheeky personal polaroids, taken by ordinary people? It could still tick all the practical boxes of showing off Ann's sophisticated, elegant wares, but with more of a voyeuristic frisson that seems - as you say - entirely in keeping with the brand.
Or it may just be me.
Posted by: Mike Reed | Sep 23, 2008 at 10:19
Yeah good point.
They are pretty real up close. Well, pseudo real, you know, marketing real. It's OK.
Posted by: Ben | Sep 23, 2008 at 11:38
Ah, but you miss the point, Mike. It's the way they're 'scattered' that really counts.
Design, you see, is all about style. Isn't it, Ben?
Posted by: davidthedesigner | Sep 23, 2008 at 11:52
David, I was relying on you for the innuendo.
Posted by: Ben | Sep 23, 2008 at 12:18
Always happy to oblige - especially when it comes to innuendo. Reminds me of the woman who asked the barman for a double entendre, so he gave her one.
Posted by: davidthedesigner | Sep 23, 2008 at 12:35
David, I see you've been reading the Saturday Guardian too. I was about to tell that one.
'Marketing real' will not do, I'm afraid, Ben. You can spot it a mile off.
Posted by: Mike Reed | Sep 23, 2008 at 15:43
Didn't Polaroids have a big "footer" border at the bottom where you held it while waving it to develop?
Posted by: Andy | Sep 23, 2008 at 17:11
andy: not with the medium format polaroids
Posted by: m | Sep 24, 2008 at 11:15